News & Events

News

Autos

[08/15] Rockford Fosgate M2 Speakers Redefine Stereo Systems For Malibu(R) Boats
[08/15] Growth in China car sales slows due to oil prices
[08/14] LBI Media, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2008 Results
[08/14] PHOTO ADVISORY -- Lincoln Mercury at the American Black Film Festival
[08/14] Take the Gas Saving 101 Quiz

More...

Personal Injury

[08/19] NY state firefighters deliver 3 babies in transit
[08/19] Suit accuses restaurant of giving man big tapeworm
[08/19] Sailor, knocked from boat, rescued 12 hours later
[08/14] Calif. mom gives birth on front lawn by herself
[08/01] Boy, 4, tries to drive to grandma's house, crashes

More...

Product Liability

[08/27] FDA OKs blood test for heart transplant rejection
[08/22] Iowa meatpacking plant cited for safety violations
[08/14] Judge lets Detroit mayor go to Democrat convention
[08/11] Authorities: Tire failure may be behind Nev. crash
[07/31] AP: Little progress in bridge repairs across US

More...

Supreme Court

[08/18] Man whose lawsuit scuttled DC gun ban gets permit
[08/05] Lawyers for Mexican say execution violates treaty
[08/01] Mexican citizen asks high court to block execution

More...

Case Summaries

Workers' Comp

[08/26] Duncan v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision granting reconsideration is annulled where the WCAB erred in holding that a sanction can be imposed against the Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust Fund (UEBTF), if its "failure to comply with the award of attorney's fees resulted from willful or bad faith actions".

[08/22] Craft v. Astrue
Denial of a motion to alter or amend a judgment that plaintiff did not qualify for Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income benefits is reversed and remanded where: 1) there was not an "accurate and logical bridge" between the ALJ's recitation of the mental medical evidence and a decision to account for plaintiff's mental impairments by limiting him to unskilled work; and 2) the stated reasons of the ALJ for finding that plaintiff lacked credibility were contradicted by the objective evidence.

[08/18] US v. Simpson
A sentence and order of restitution imposed for defendant's crime of mail fraud, involving his underreporting of payroll information for his businesses to his workers' compensation insurance carriers, is affirmed where the district court correctly concluded that the "loss" caused by this conduct was the amount of additional premiums that the insurance carriers would have charged had they been given accurate information.

[08/11] Ridings v. Riverside Med. Ctr.
In an employee's suit alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and state worker's compensation law, summary judgment for defendant-employer is affirmed where: 1) an interference claim failed because evidence regarding plaintiff's invocation of FMLA, and defendant's requests that she provide adequate medical certification, did not demonstrate that plaintiff was entitled to leave under the FMLA and that defendant denied her FMLA benefits to which she was entitled; 2) defendant could not be deemed to have retaliated against plaintiff by asking her to fulfill her obligations under the FMLA; and 3) a state-law retaliation claim failed as defendant articulated a valid basis for terminating plaintiff, and plaintiff failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence to show that such basis was pretext.

[08/08] Mt. Diablo Unified Sch. Dist. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
Temporary disability payments commence when a school district pays an injured employee his or her normal wages under Education Code section 44043.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Online Case Consulation

Do you have a case? Use our online consultation form. After completing it, we will contact you as soon as possible to provide you with answers to your concerns.
My Online Consultation

What People Say About Us

Everything that was said and discussed was explained to me. I was always kept informed. I benefited from the fast service, reasonable settlement and honesty. - N. Stocker
Read More Testimonials


Location: 300 W Douglas Avenue | Wichita, Kansas (KS) 67202 | 1-316-263-0001 | 1-888-263-0001 | Email Us