(316) 263-0001
Call for a free consultation
In personal injury cases, damages can be categorized into economic and non-economic types. Economic damages include medical expenses and lost wages, while non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and mental anguish. These are determined by factors such as medical care quality and documentation, as well as the testimony of family and friends who observe the impact of injuries.
The valuation of pain and suffering is subjective and largely depends on the jury's perspective. Factors influencing this include the quality of medical care and how well symptoms are documented in medical records. It's essential for clients to communicate all injuries to their doctors, even those initially overshadowed by more severe injuries, to ensure comprehensive documentation.
Quantifying mental anguish often involves counseling or psychiatric evaluations, which help establish the extent of emotional distress. Testimonies from family and friends who notice changes in the injured person's behavior also provide valuable insights. This information is crucial for presenting a complete picture to adjusters or juries.
Before and after witnesses, such as family and friends, are pivotal in demonstrating the impact of an injury on a person's life. They can provide testimony about changes in the individual's physical and emotional well-being, offering a clear contrast between the person's condition before and after the accident.
Calculating lost wages usually requires the input of vocational specialists and economists. These professionals assess the injured person's work history and potential future earnings, comparing pre- and post-injury job capabilities. They calculate the difference in earnings, offering a detailed analysis of future economic loss.
Economic loss of services includes the value of household tasks that the injured party can no longer perform. This can be documented through forms filled by those providing assistance, such as neighbors or hired help, which are then submitted for reimbursement and used to support damage claims in court.
Permanent restrictions are evaluated by detailed medical documentation. Doctors assess what the injured person can and cannot do, with their findings used to substantiate claims for economic losses and future care needs. Independent medical examinations often provide a comprehensive overview, especially in complex cases.
Valuing scarring or disfigurement can vary significantly based on factors like age, gender, and visibility of the scar. For instance, a visible scar on a young woman might be valued differently than on an older man due to societal perceptions. Juries ultimately decide the compensation based on these cultural biases.
Future medical care is estimated through independent medical examinations and the creation of life care plans by specialized professionals. These experts evaluate the injured person's medical needs and project future care costs, providing detailed reports to support claims in court or negotiations.
The Martinez case allows insurance companies to present reduced medical bill amounts to juries, reflecting what was actually paid after write-offs. This can undervalue the perception of injuries, but attorneys counter this by showing the full billed amount and explaining the discrepancy to ensure fair valuation.
Loss of consortium refers to the loss of familial affection and companionship due to injuries, affecting relationships with spouses and children. It is an important claim in personal injury cases as it represents damages not covered by other types of recovery, emphasizing the non-economic impact on family dynamics.
